Table 1.
Decision Matrix for Hypothetical Job Offers.
Table 2.
Hypothetical Time 1 → Time 2 Coherence Shifts for Decision Maker with Initial Leaning Toward Job Offer 1—Splendor.
Table 3.
Decision Matrices Varying in Attribute Conflict Intensity, Study 1.
Fig 1.
Mean aversiveness index values by attribute conflict intensity (with standard errors), Study 1. Note: 1 = “Not at All,” … 9 = “Extremely.”
Table 4.
Study 2 Procedure Sequence and Materials.
Fig 2.
Mean skin conductance response (SCR), in μS, by coherence shifting (low, moderate, high) at 2000 ms, Study 2.
Time 1 and Time 2 are “pre-choice” rating periods, while Time 3 is “post-choice.” (Bars represent standard errors of the mean.)*
Fig 3.
Scatterplots depicting the association between coherence shifting (NACSOverall) and mean skin conductance response (SCR), in μS, at each of three time points.
Time 1 and Time 2 are “pre-choice” rating periods, while Time 3 is “post-choice.”
Fig 4.
Mean coherence shifting scores for desirability ratings, dimension importance weights, and combined (i.e., NACSOverall), per manipulated resource depletion via ambient discomfort level—high, low, and baseline (with standard errors), Study 3.