Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of study screening, eligibility, and inclusion.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Risk of bias assessments for randomized controlled trials.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Risk of bias/quality assessments for observational studies.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

GRADE Summary of Findings Table for Primary outcomes.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Proportion of patients with documented advance care planning.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Proportion of patients with documented advance care planning discussions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Concordance between care desired by patients and care received by patients at the end-of-life.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

GRADE Summary of Findings Table—Secondary outcomes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Patient preferences for life-prolonging as opposed to comfort care.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Funnel plot for outcome “Patient preferences for life-prolonging treatments”.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Quality of communication between patient and substitute decision-maker (SDM)—concordance between patient and SDM for level of care desired at end-of-life.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Quality of communication score between patients and health care providers.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Patient and family knowledge of life-supporting treatments.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Patient and family knowledge of advance care planning.

More »

Fig 12 Expand