Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Physical environment variables screened in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Climate variables evaluated in the study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Population and housing variables evaluated in the study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Plot of reported number of cases submitted to different state health departments in the study region.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Results of bivariate regression analysis and candidate variables (p ≤ 0.2).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Model statistics for Bayesian spatio–temporal covariate models evaluating county–level RMSF prevalence in four central Midwestern states (Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma), United States of America.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Model fit and comparison criteria.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

The posterior median and 95% CrI for the overall time trend in the covariate model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

County–level crude rate estimates of Rocky Mountain spotted fever prevalence reported to the state health departments for the study period, 2005–2014.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

County–specific Bayesian smoothed estimates (posterior median) of Rocky Mountain spotted fever prevalence for the study period between years 2005–2014.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Posterior median of county–specific differential trends. Counties with values closer to 0 indicate a higher risk for RMSF.

More »

Fig 5 Expand