Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Descriptive data of the participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Physiological (%HRR) responses to the two exercise intensity trials.

Data are shown as means ± standard error. * p < 0.01, moderate-exercise intensity significantly different from vigorous-exercise intensity.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Perceived exertion responses to the two exercise intensity trials.

Data are shown as means ± standard error. * p < 0.01, moderate-exercise intensity significantly different from vigorous-exercise intensity.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Temporal dynamics of the affective valence and perceived activation responses to the two exercise intensity trials.

Data are shown as means ± standard error. * p < 0.01, moderate-exercise intensity significantly different from vigorous-exercise intensity.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Pearson average correlation r coefficients of preference for and the self-efficacy components with psychophysiological responses at each of the two exercise intensity trials.

More »

Table 2 Expand