Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Genetic divergences in accordance with different taxonomic levels within Denticollinae.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The seven congeneric morphospecies pairs with low interspecific distances.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Maximum intraspecific distances by Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) for 46 morphospecies.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Number of MOTUs in accordance with different threshold values.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

The 11 morphospecies representing typically variable intraspecific distances.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

The number of MOTUs by the prior intraspecific divergence using ABGD with two values of relative gap width (X = 1.0 in A, 1.5 in B).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

MOTU recognition per morphospecies using the ABGD method.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

MOTU recognition per morphospecies in the Poisson Tree Processes model.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Neighbor-joining tree for the 420 individuals of the 84 morphospecies in this study based on COI barcode sequences.

Clade colors represent three different tribes: the green clades denote Hypnoidini, the red clades represent Ctenicerini, and the blue clades show Denticollini. The red text indicates the unexpectedly highly divergent taxa in a single species. The blue highlight denotes unexpectedly low divergence between a species pair, the green highlight represents the taxa successfully identified by DNA barcode, and the yellow highlight indicates ambiguously defined subspecies.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Selatosomus spp.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Hemicrepidius spp. and their habitus and aedeagus.

A: H. coreanus; B. H. sp. 1 (no. 3310, a candidate new species); C: H. oblongus from Far East Russia (no. 2397, a candidate new pseudocryptic species); D: H. oblongus, Korea and Far East Russia; E. H. sp. 2, GW (a candidate new species); F: H. hallaensis, JJ.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Prosternon aurichalceum.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Athous spp.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Stenagostus umbratilis.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Actenicerus spp.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Two subspecies of Denticollis nigricollis.

A and B: D. n. nigricollis; C and D: D. n. subsp. 1 (a candidate new subspecies identified by morphological examination). A and C: Dorsal view of adult; B and D: Aedeagus.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Denticollis nigricollis.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Neighbor-joining cladogram inferred from COI partial gene sequences of Ctenicerini gen. and sp. 1 and sp. 2.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Schematic definition for a suitable threshold value (3.6%) for genetic distances and zone requiring integrative taxonomy (2.5–3.5%) suggested for the Denticollid taxa.

More »

Fig 14 Expand