Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of participants.

Fig 1 shows the flow diagram of participants in this study. We began with records of all patients who presented to the ER between April 2011 and March 2012. After the random sampling and exclusions indicated in the Figure, we analysed data from 1515 patients for the derivation set, and data from 467 patients for the validation set.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Univariate associations between candidate predictors and true bacteremia in the derivation set,

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis (n = 1288) and scoring.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Percentages of patients with true bacteremia, by ID-BactER score.

Fig 2 shows, for each of five categories defined by ID-BactER score, the percentage of patients in that category who had true bacteremia.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Fig 3 shows the ROC curves for the ID-BactER score.

ROC curves of ID-BactER score. The ●s indicate results from the derivation set, and the ○s indicate results from the validation set. The areas under the curves are 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77–0.83) for the derivation set and 0.74 (0.68–0.80) for the validation set.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance of the ID-BactER score.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Three existing models and our model developed in ER settings.

More »

Table 5 Expand