Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow-chart of study selection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Methodological quality of cohort studies included in the meta-analysis*.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Methodological quality of case-control studies included in the meta-analysis*.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Methodological quality of cross-sectional studies included in the meta-analysis*.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plots (random effect model) of meta-analysis on the relationship between passive maternal smoking and preterm birth by study design.

Squares indicate study-specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study-specific statistical weight); horizontal lines indicate 95% CIs; diamond indicates the summary risk estimate with its 95% CI.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Funnel plot corresponding to the random-effects meta-analysis of the relationship between passive maternal smoking and preterm birth.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plots (random effect model) of meta-analysis on the relationship between passive maternal smoking and preterm birth by exposure location.

Squares indicate study-specific risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study-specific statistical weight); horizontal lines indicate 95% CIs; diamond indicates the summary risk estimate with its 95% CI.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Summary risk estimates of the associations between passive maternal smoking and preterm birth.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

Sensitivity plot corresponding to the relationship between passive maternal smoking and preterm birth.

More »

Fig 5 Expand