Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Experimental system for maze solving.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Maze solving by our algorithm.

The yellow cell is the current position of the explorer. Blue cells indicate a unique road to the target. Cyan cells are cells which have not been explored, and walls of these cells now are unknown to the explorer. Pink slash (“∖”) denotes the non-visited dead road, red cross (“×”) denotes the visited dead road. (a) Left-hand. (b)Right-hand.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Steps and coverage rates of maze solving by our algorithm, wall follower, Pledge and Tremaux’s algorithm.

Results are presented as mean±s.e.m. on the right. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Maze solving by rat cyborgs.

The red point is the body position, the black point is the head position, and the blue line is the heading direction of the rat cyborg. Our rat cyborg tracking method (see Algorithm 2) is implemented by OpenCV. Blue cells indicate a unique road to the target. Red cells are cells which have not been explored, and walls of these cells now are unknown to the rat cyborg. The pink slash (“∖”) denotes the non-visited dead road, the red cross (“×”) denotes the visited dead road, and the yellow “g” denotes entrances to the unexplored area. Consecutive blue points indicate the shortest path to the current destination. The shortest path is detected by A* algorithm [37].

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Steps of maze solving by computer, rats and rat cyborgs.

The steps of maze solving by DH12, SV15, SV17, MV12, M01 and M03 are shown from the top to the bottom, respectively. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. on the right. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Coverage rates of maze solving by computer, rats and rat cyborgs.

The coverage rates of maze solving by DH12, SV15, SV17, MV12, M01 and M03 are shown from the top to the bottom, respectively. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. on the right. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Time spent of maze solving by rats and rat cyborgs.

The time spent of maze solving by DH12, SV15, SV17, MV12, M01 and M03 are shown from the top to the bottom, respectively. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. on the right. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The Pearson’s correlation coefficients of steps and coverage rates between each other within the six rats/rat cyborgs.

(a) Correlation coefficients of steps within the six rats. (b) Correlation coefficients of steps within the six rat cyborgs. (c) Correlation coefficients of coverage rates within the six rats. (d) Correlation coefficients of coverage rates within the six rat cyborgs.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 1.

The Pearson’s correlation coefficients of steps and coverage rates between computer and rats, computer and rat cyborgs, and rats and rat cyborgs.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 9.

Steps, coverage rates and time spent of maze solving by computer, M01 and M03 in maze 15 to maze 19.

(a) Steps of maze solving by computer and M01. (b) Steps of maze solving by computer and M03. (c) Coverage rates of maze solving by computer and M01. (d) Coverage rates of maze solving by computer and M03. (e) Time spent of maze solving by computer and M01. (f) Time spent of maze solving by computer and M03.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Steps, coverage rates and time spent of maze solving by computer, M01 and M03 in maze 20 to maze 24.

(a) Steps of maze solving by computer and M01. (b) Steps of maze solving by computer and M03. (c) Coverage rates of maze solving by computer and M01. (d) Coverage rates of maze solving by computer and M03. (e) Time spent of maze solving by computer and M01. (f) Time spent of maze solving by computer and M03.

More »

Fig 10 Expand