Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Pictorial diagram of timeframe and information used for investigating the prediction of CVD events in this analysis.

x = censored due to diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: • = censored due to death from diseases other than cardiovascular disease.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of EPIC-Norfolk participants included in this analysis by levels of estimated 10-year absolute cardiovascular risk, the Framingham risk score (FRS), at the baseline health examination (n = 12,197).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Rates of a first cardiovascular events by levels of estimated absolute risk at the first (FRS1) and second health examination four years later (FRS2).

Note: The line above each bar indicates the 95% confidence interval, and the number above each bar represents the number of participants in each risk category.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Comparisons between the risk scores at different health examinations of the measures of predictive ability for a first cardiovascular event in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort (n = 12,197).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Cardiovascular disease risk classification comparing the Framingham risk score at baseline with the Framingham risk score at the second health examination in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort (n = 12,197).

More »

Table 3 Expand