Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics considered for assessment of risk of bias adapted to Cochrane approach Study Quality Guide [28].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flowchart of the systematic review process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Incidence of ESRD in populations with incident and prevalent diabetes–study characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Incidence of ESRD in populations with incident and prevalent diabetes–results.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Incidence of ESRD in populations with prevalent diabetes partly compared to non-diabetic populations–results.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Age-sex-adjusted relative risks of ESRD due to all causes between diabetic and non-diabetic populations.

ESRD, end-stage renal disease. Confidence intervals (CI) were not shown as not all studies reported incidence rates of ESRD with the corresponding 95% CIs.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Time trend of age-adjusted incidence rates of ESRD due to diabetic nephropathy.

ESRD, end-stage renal disease; IR, incidence rate. Confidence intervals (CI) were not shown as not all studies reported incidence rates of ESRD with the corresponding 95% CIs.

More »

Fig 3 Expand