Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Neutral expression, last frame of disgust at low, intermediate, and high expression intensity (from left to right).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Raw and unbiased hit rates in percentages for the 3 intensity levels.

Error bars represent standard errors of the means.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Raw and unbiased hit rates in percentages for the 10 emotion categories.

Error bars represent standard errors of the means.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Raw Hit Rates (H) and Unbiased Hit Rates (Hu) for the 10 Emotion Categories.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Raw hit rates in percentages for the 9 emotion categories at each of the 3 intensity levels.

Error bars represent standard errors of the means.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Raw Hit Rates (H) for the Emotion Categories by Intensity.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Unbiased hit rates in percentages for the 9 emotion categories at each of the 3 intensity levels.

Error bars represent standard errors of the means.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Unbiased Hit Rates (Hu) for the Emotion Categories by Intensity.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Response latencies (in ms) to the three intensity levels of the ADFES-BIV videos from study 1 and the first-last videos from study 2.

Error bars represent standard errors of the means.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Response latencies to the ten emotion categories of the ADFES-BIV in ms.

Error bars represent standard errors of the means.

More »

Fig 7 Expand