Fig 1.
The seedlings of DXWR showed stronger salt resistance than the seedlings of XB.
Table 1.
Summary of Illumina transcriptome reads mapped to the reference genome.
Table 2.
Summary of Illumina transcriptome reads mapped to the reference genes.
Fig 2.
The number of up- and down-regulated transcripts in the LS and RS compared with the LCK and RCK.
LS, leaves with salt treatment; RS, roots with salt treatment; LCK, leaves without salt treatment; RCK, roots without salt treatment.
Table 3.
List of published salt resistant genes among the DEGs detected by RNA-Seq.
Fig 3.
Gene ontology (GO) classification of the unigenes from the LS-vs-LCK (A) and RS-vs-RCK (B).
Table 4.
The significant GO terms of DEGs for the biological process category both in the LS vs. LCK and RS vs. RCK.
Fig 4.
KEGG pathway assignments in the LS vs. LCK (A) and RS vs. RCK (B).
The represented categories (Q-value≤ 0.05) and the number of transcripts predicted to belong to each category are shown.
Fig 5.
The number of up- and down-regulated genes in the LS (LS vs. LCK), RS (RS vs. RCK), shoots, and roots.
(A), up-regulated genes in the LS, shoots, and roots; (B), up-regulated genes in the RS, shoots, and roots; (C), down-regulated genes in the LS, shoots, and roots; (D), down-regulated genes in the RS, shoots, and roots.