Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The radiance reaching the smartphone camera is the summation of the transmitted light from the object and airlight from the sun after scattering by air, water and PM in atmosphere.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The histogram of PM2.5 in different cities.

(a) Beijing; (b) Shanghai; (c) Phoenix.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

PM estimation via outdoor image analysis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Sample photos in our haze detection database.

a) Photos captured at Beijing, Shanghai and Phoenix respectively. b) Boundary lines (blue lines in b) between distant buildings and sky. c) Selected ROIs (red boxes). Reprinted under a CC BY license, with permission from [Yi Zou], original copyright [2014].

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The transmission decreases as the distance or PM2.5 index increases.

(a) Schematic illustration of transmission variation with distance. (b) Four ROIs (r1~r4) located at increasing distances. (c) The estimated transmission map. (d) Semi-logarithmic plots of transmission curves vs. distance under different haze conditions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Image features variation with PM index.

(a~d): Hazy images showing that the contrast of the building region decreases with the PM index, where the lower panel shows the zooming-in images of the regions marked by the red boxes. (e) The normalized features vs. PM2.5 index plot, including ROI RMS contrast (blue), image entropy (black), and image RMS contrast (red).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Sky gradient and blue component provide weather information, such as cloud formation.

(a) Sunny day; (b) Partly cloudy/sunny day; (c) Hazy day; (d) Cloudy day.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Sky color dependence on solar zenith angle.

(a) Definition of solar zenith angle. (b) Sample images show that the sky near horizon is red during sunrise and sunset on the same day compared with noon time.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Real PM2.5 index vs. predicted PM2.5 index plot.

(a) Beijing; (b) Shanghai; (c) Phoenix.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 1.

Assessment of the support vector regression.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Regression results for different weather conditions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Regression results with and without humidity as a feature.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The features and their correlations with PM2.5 index in our dataset.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 10.

PCA-SVR results for Beijing and Shanghai’s dataset.

(a) RMSE. (b) R-squared.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 5.

The performance comparison between all the features and the optimized feature subsets for Beijing and Shanghai’s dataset.

More »

Table 5 Expand