Fig 1.
Two alternative hypothesis of the process of stereopsis, (a) Schematic diagram of traditional view, (b) Schematic diagram of recent discovery.
Fig 2.
Structure of the proposed metric.
Fig 3.
Summation and difference of stereo pair (a) Left view, (b) Right view, (c) binocular difference map and (d) binocular summation map.
Fig 4.
Each subband is indexed by a level λ and an orientation θ. θ = 2, 3, 4 denote the vertical, horizontal, and diagonal subbands, respectively.
Fig 5.
Decoupling Result of Test Binocular Summation.
Fig 6.
CSF curve.
Fig 7.
Weighting matrix w used in contrast masking.
Fig 8.
20 left views of original stereo image pairs.
Fig 9.
One of the original left view images and the corresponding five types of distortion.
(a) Original left view. (b) JEPG compressed. (c) JEPG 2000 compressed. (d) White noise. (e) Blur. (f) Fast fading.
Fig 10.
Scatter plots of objective scores versus subjective scores for the eight metric, (a)SSIM, (b)PSNR, (c)ADM, (d) Benoit’s scheme, (e) Chen’s scheme, and (f) Proposed scheme.
Table 1.
Performance comparison.
Table 2.
Run Time of each metric.
Table 3.
Performance comparison of each distortion.
Fig 11.
10 statistic results of 18 distorted pairs of an original pair.
Fig 12.
Performance comparison of each part and overall.
Table 4.
Performance comparison on SVBL 3D database.