Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Brain regions with significantly lower activation in the conduct disorder group relative to the healthy control group during response inhibition (p< .05 [false discovery rate–corrected]).

IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; pre-SMA, pre-supplementary motor area.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Brain regions showing significantly lower activation in the conduct disorder group relative to the healthy control group during response inhibition.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Effective connectivity within the response inhibition network in healthy controls (HC) and subjects with conduct disorder (CD).

Left: Significant connectivity in the HC group; middle: significant connectivity in the CD group; right: connectivity showing significant group differences (dark blue, HC>CD; white, CD>HC). IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; pre-SMA, pre-supplementary motor area.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlations between effective connectivity and behavioral scores in the conduct disorder group (p< .05).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The GoStop task paradigm used in this study.

More »

Fig 4 Expand