Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Pre-treatment mean DCE, volumes and clinical parameters in 83 SCC sites (primary plus nodal) correlated with SF or SC at the same site, based on a minimum of 2 year clinical follow-up.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pre-treatment mean DCE parameters in 43 primary sites and 40 nodal sites correlated with SF or SC at the same SCC site, based on a minimum of 2 year clinical follow-up.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

MRI, AUGC and kep maps in the axial plane from a 70 year old male with oropharyngeal carcinoma and SC 46.7 months after chemoradiotherapy.

(a) Pre-treatment T1-weighted post contrast image of the SCC, (b) Pre-treatment AUGC map (mean AUGC = 2.36), (c) Pre-treatment kep map (mean kep = 1.62); (d) Post-treatment T1-weighted post contrast image of the SC residual mass, (e) Post-treatment AUGC map (mean AUGC = 0.96), (f) Post-treatment kep map (mean kep = 0.09).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

MRI, AUGC and kep maps in the axial plane from an 85 year old male with oral cavity carcinoma with SF 3.6 months after chemoradiotherapy.

(a) Pre-treatment T1-weighted post contrast image of the SCC, (b) Pre-treatment AUGC map (mean AUGC = 3.07), (c) Pre-treatment kep map (mean kep = 0.88); (d) Post-treatment T1-weighted post contrast image of the residual mass with SF, (e) Post-treatment AUGC map AUGC (mean AUGC = 3.72), (f) Post-treatment kep map (mean kep = 0.63).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Box plots showing pre-treatment AUGC in 33 SCC sites and post-treatment AUGC in SC and SF residual masses.

SC residual masses showed significantly lower AUGC than SF residual masses.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Receiver-operating characteristics curve. Receiver operating characteristic curve for the % change in AUGC of a post-treatment residual mass, for distinguishing between SC residual masses and SF residual masses.

Area under the curve of 0.77 when using a > 19.78% increase in AUGC to predict SF.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Post treatment residual mass in 33 SCC sites (primary plus nodal): mean DCE and volumes (and % change when compared to pre-treatment), and clinical parameters for SC residual masses and SF residual masses, based on a minimum of 2 year clinical follow-up.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance of % change in AUGC to identify residual masses with SF.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Post-treatment residual mass in 19 primary sites and 14 nodal sites; mean DCE parameters (and % change when compared to pre-treatment) for SC residual masses and SF residual masses, based on a minimum of 2 year clinical follow-up.

More »

Table 5 Expand