Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of study selection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of included literatures.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Various indicators of included literatures.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Evaluation on included and excluded literatures.

a

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Heterogeneity test results.

(A) the estimates for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in HCC diagnosis. (B) the estimates for combination of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and DWI sequence in HCC diagnosis.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Funnel plot of the estimates for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in HCC diagnosis.

(A) sensitivity analysis. (B) specificity analysis. (C) positive likelihood ratio analysis. (D) negative likelihood ratio analysis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plots of the estimates for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in HCC diagnosis.

(A) sensitivity analysis. (B) specificity analysis. (C) positive likelihood ratio analysis. (D) negative likelihood ratio analysis.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forest plots of the estimates for combination of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and DWI sequence in HCC diagnosis.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC).

(A) SROC curve for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in HCC diagnosis. (B) SROC curve for combination of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and DWI sequence in HCC diagnosis.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Meta regression analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand