Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

General properties of the soils tested.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Soil particulate organic matters contents in the different rotation systems.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Soil potentially mineralizable N (PMN) contents under the different rotation systems.

Note: RR corresponds to the rice-rapeseed rotation and CR corresponds to the cotton-rapeseed rotation. Sites A, B, C, and D represent the 4 paired soils from which particulate organic matter (POM) was removed to study the effects of POM removal on soil N mineralization.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The relationships between the content of POM-N and PMN.

Note: RR corresponds to the rice-rapeseed rotation, and CR corresponds to the cotton-rapeseed rotation. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 31).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The effects of POM removal on the soil PMN contents under the different rotation systems.

Note: RR corresponds to the rice-rapeseed rotation, and CR corresponds to the cotton-rapeseed rotation. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean (n = 2).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Generalized linear model analysis of sources of variation of soil potentially mineralizable N (PMN) contents under two different rotations and particulate organic matter removal treatment.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The relationships between the ratio of POM-N to TN and the reduction rate of PMN after POM-removal.

Note: the hollow open represent the soils from the rice-rapeseed rotation and the solid symbols represent the soils from the cotton-rapeseed rotation. Reduction rate of PMN = (PMNoriginal soil—PMNPOM-removal soil) / PMNoriginal soil × 100.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Effect of POM removal on soil microbial biomass C, N and C/N ratio under the different rotation systems.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The relationships between the reduction rates of microbial biomass N (MBN) and PMN after POM-removal.

Note: the open symbols represent the soils from the rice-rapeseed rotation and the solid symbols represent the soils from the cotton-rapeseed rotation. Reduction rate of MBN = (MBNoriginal soil—MBNPOM-removal soil)/MBNoriginal soil × 100; reduction rate of PMN = (PMNoriginal soil—PMNPOM-removal soil) / PMNoriginal soil × 100.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Effect of POM removal on the contribution of soil microbial biomass N to soil potential mineralizable N under the different rotation systems.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The relationships between the reduction rate of the contribution of MBN to PMN and the reduction rate of PMN content after POM-removal.

Note: the open symbols represent the soils from the rice-rapeseed rotation and the solid symbols represent the soils from the cotton-rapeseed rotation. The contribution of soil MBN to PMN = MBN / PMN; decrease in the rate of contribution of MBN to PMN = (Contribution original soil—Contribution POM-removal soil) / Contribution original soil × 100; Reduction rate of PMN = (PMNoriginal soil—PMNPOM-removal soil) / PMNoriginal soil × 100.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Infrared spectroscopy of soil POM under the different rotation systems.

Note: RR corresponds to the rice-rapeseed rotation, and CR corresponds to the cotton-rapeseed rotation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand