Fig 1.
Flowchart of study participants.
Table 1.
Sample sociodemographic characteristics (n = 130).
Table 2.
Number of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes* detected by each sample collection method.
Table 3.
Number of low-risk HPV genotypes* detected by each sample collection method.
Table 4.
Agreement and HPV positivity for each collection method, overall (n = 130) and according to cytology results (n = 119).
Table 5.
Agreement and HPV positivity for each collection method, overall (n = 130) and according to cytology results (n = 119).
Table 6.
Comparison between number of oncogenic HPV genotypes* detected in the three different samples (s-FTA vs. Dr-WET; s-FTA vs. s-DRY; s-DRY vs. Dr-WET).
Table 7.
Clinical performance of self-collection and physician-collection methods
Table 8.
Sample preferences and opinions regarding collection methods (n = 130).