Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example photographs for oocyte scoring system.

The figure represents the oocyte grading system for the six morphological characteristics analyzed in this project (Morphology, Size, Cytoplasm, ZP, PVS and PB). For each oocyte, each single characteristic was graded as worst (-1), average (0), or best (1) creating a TOS by adding up individual parameter assessments.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of TOS among studied patients.

Fig 2 is the histogram of Total Score. The Total Score distribution is not symmetric.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of 594 oocytes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Univariate associations of oocyte characteristics with Day 3 embryo ≥ 8 cells.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Univariate associations of oocyte characteristics with Day 3 embryo Grade.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

ROC curves for oocyte and embryo scores.

Among the 69 patients with embryos of Grade 4 or better available for transfer 23 achieved Clinical Pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to the 69 transfers with Good quality embryos (≥ Grade 4) the Oocyte Scoring System (TOS) (AUC±SE 0.863±0.044, oocyte score) provided significantly greater predictive value for clinical pregnancy compared to the embryo grade alone (AUC 0.646 ± 0.072, embryo grade) p = 0.015.

More »

Fig 3 Expand