Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Fingerspelled versions of NIE ‘no’: N-I-E and #NIE.

The individual in this figure has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Two ways of articulating the fingerspelled loan sign #NIE: lexically or expressively.

The two individuals in this figure have given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

PJM sign ZDĄŻYĆ ‘make it’ with the grammaticalized negative prefix NEG-.

(A) the lexicalized loan #NIE (B) the lexical base ZDĄŻYĆ ‘make it’ (C) prefixed sign NEG+ZDĄŻYĆ ‘miss’. The individual in this figure has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

PJM sign ZGADZAĆ-SIĘ ‘agree’ with the grammaticalized negative prefix NEG-.

(A) the lexicalized loan #NIE (B) the lexical base ZGADZAĆ-SIĘ ‘agree’ (C) prefixed sign NEG+ZGADZAĆ-SIĘ ‘disagree’. The individual in this figure has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Examples of prefixed PJM signs as negated verbs or adjectives.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 5.

Handshape and location assimilation in the prefixed sign NEG+ROZUMIEĆ.

(A) the lexical base ROZUMIEĆ ‘understand’ (B) prefixed sign NEG+ROZUMIEĆ ‘not understand’. The individual in this figure has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Examples of a suppletive negative and a negative suffix.

The two individuals in this figure have given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of selected types of irregular negatives.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Signs that can (left column) and cannot (right column) take the prefix NEG-.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Examples of two signs.

The individual in this figure has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The comparison of two signs with identical sequences of movements: convex arc-straight.

Abbreviations: ω, word; μ, morpheme; ơ, syllable. The two individuals in this figure have given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The PJM signs SPRAWIEDLIWE ‘fair’ and NEG+SPRAWIEDLIWE ‘unfair’.

The individual in this figure has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of morphological constraints on sequential compounding and prefixation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of phonological constraints on sequential compounding and prefixation.

More »

Table 5 Expand