Fig 1.
Localities of D. incarnata var. cruenta (yellow circle), D. incarnata var. incarnata (black square), D. incarnata var. ochroleuca (red square), D. maculata ssp. fuchsii (red circle), D. maculata ssp. maculata (green circle), D. majalis ssp. lapponica (yellow square), D. majalis ssp. majalis (blue circle), and D. majalis ssp. traunsteineri (green square) used in the modeling.
Fig 2.
European distribution of the suitable niches of D. majalis ssp. lapponica (A), D. majalis ssp. majalis (B), and D. majalis ssp. traunsteineri (C) within their currently known geographical range in the LGM (PMIP2 based models).
Fig 3.
European distribution of the suitable niches of D. incarnata var. cruenta (A), D. incarnata var. incarnata (B), and D. incarnata var. ochroleuca (C) within their currently known geographical range in the LGM (PMIP2 based models).
Fig 4.
European distribution of the suitable niches of D. maculata ssp. fuchsii (A) and D. maculata ssp. maculata (B) within their currently known geographical range in the LGM (PMIP2 based models).
Fig 5.
Current distribution of suitable niches of D. majalis ssp. lapponica (A), D. majalis ssp. majalis (B), and D. majalis ssp. traunsteineri (C).
Fig 6.
Current distribution of suitable niches of D. incarnata var. cruenta (A), D. incarnata var. incarnata (B), and D. incarnata var. ochroleuca (C).
Fig 7.
Current distribution of suitable niches of D. maculata ssp. fuchsii (A) and D. maculata ssp. maculata (B).
Table 1.
The global coverage [km2] of the most suitable habitats for Dactylorhiza representatives (suitability of over 0.7) in the present time and in 2080 (A1b, A2a, B2a).
Table 2.
The coverage [km2] of the most suitable habitats for Dactylorhiza representatives (suitability of over 0.7) at present time and in 2080 (A1b, A2a, B2a) in Europe and Asia.