Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Consort Flow Diagram of trial from enrollment through analysis.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

PI-RADS Scoring System.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

SQS Scoring System, Step 1: Calculate raw score by adding points for each finding listed.

Score range is between 0–4.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

SQS Scoring System, Step 2: Calculate Overall SQS suspicion score.

Select PZ or TZ then use the raw score to select the initial level of suspicion. Next move left to right taking into account the T2, ADC, DCE findings. You must meet all the criteria on each line to obtain the overall suspicion score on the right side of the table; otherwise use the lower score.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

5-point scale: Overall SQS Score and PI-RADS use the same terminology for grading.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Zonal Anatomy.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Prostate mpMRI. A.

T2 sequence with a low signal intensity in Zone 3L. B. DWI with corresponding ADC restriction C. DCE with early arterial uptake. D. MR US fusion directed biopsy detected Gleason 3+4, 2.5 mm. Please see supplemental report regarding specific lesion based reporting.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Cancer detection rates for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer stratified by scoring system.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 8.

Distribution of lesions reported on mpMRI stratified by SQS Score.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Distribution of lesions on mpMRI stratified by PI-RADS Score.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

ROC curve analysis: Patient-based.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

ROC curve analysis: Lesion-based.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 2.

Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, Sensitivity and Specificity at each cut point in each scoring system for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Patient-level analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, Sensitivity and Specificity at each cut point in each scoring system for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Lesion-level analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand