Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Analysis Workflow.

BAM files from BWA, Isaac aligner, and Bowtie2 were paired with each of GATK, Isaac variant caller, and SAMTools run both with and without additional filtering (VQSR, BAQ, and LowGQX respectively). Output vcf files were regularized using custom code and variants from GIAB high quality regions taken forward to generate false positive and false negative rates.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Software concordance Venn diagrams.

Merged variant calls for each tool were overlapped with other tools of the same variety for each variant type. Aligners are compared in row 1, variant callers without filtering in row 2 and variant callers with filtering in row 3.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Software concordance ROC curves.

Merged variant calls for each tool were calculated and ROC curves generated using the genome quality score. Aligners are compared in row 1, variant callers without filtering in row 2, and variant callers with filtering in row 3.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Total SNV calls and tool-specific SNV calls for each aligner and variant caller run with and without filtering.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Total deletion calls and tool-specific deletion calls for each aligner and variant caller run with and without filtering.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Total insertion calls and tool-specific insertion calls for each aligner and variant caller run with and without filtering.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Variant calls grouped by frequency of detection.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

SNV calls for GIAB data at simulated contamination levels.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Melanoma cell line control variant calls overlapping annotated ClinVar melanoma risk factors.

More »

Table 6 Expand