Table 1.
Three Index Screening Instruments.
Table 2.
Summary of Properties for Three Index Screening Instruments.
Table 3.
Description of Individual Covariates of the Sample.
Table 4.
Baseline Characteristics, the Mean Scores of the Screening Instruments the Sample, and the Prevalence of DSM-defined Psychiatric Disorders of the Sample (N = 179a).
Fig 1.
Crude ROC Curves of the Index Screening Instruments and their Short Forms for Current Major Depression (N = 190); Footnotes: All reported 95% confidence intervals were constructed by bias-corrected bootstrap method with 2000 replicates (Efron & Tibshirani, 1994)
Table 5.
Comparison of AUCs between Pairs of Index Screening Instruments and the AUCs between Original and the Short-form of Each Instrument (N = 190).
Fig 2.
Adjusted ROC Curves of the Index Screening Instruments and their Short Forms for Major Depressive Disorder (N = 179a); Footnotes: All reported 95% confidence intervals were constructed by bias-corrected bootstrap method with 2000 replicates (Efron & Tibshirani, 1994); AUC = Area under the curve; aOf 190 patients, 179 provided demographic, psychosocial and behavioural information;
Table 6.
Multivariable ROC Analysisa for the Index Screening Instruments and their Short Forms for Current Major Depression Disorder (N = 179b).
Table 7.
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Index Screening Instruments and their Short Forms by Cut-offs for Current Major Depression (N = 190).
Fig 3.
Comparison Between Adjusted ROC Curves of the Original Instruments for Current Major Depression and that of their Corresponding Reduced Scales After Removing Items Related to Somatic Symptoms of HIV (N = 179a); Footnotes: All reported 95% confidence intervals were constructed by bias-corrected bootstrap method with 2000 replicates (Efron & Tibshirani, 1994); AUC = Area under the curve; aOf 190 patients, 179 provided demographic, psychosocial and behavioural information; bItems (i.e., fatigue, sleep, appetite, not being able to shake the blues, feeling bothered, feeling depressed, and lack of concentration) correspond to previously reported somatic symptoms of HIV infection (Kalichman, Rompa, &Cage, 2000).
Table 8.
Inter-rater Agreement of Pairs of Index Screening Instruments and Internal Consistency for each Instrument.