Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Illustrative frames from the six shots in the 12 second clip of the film “Moonraker” [42].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Each graph represents the proportion of participants who reported a critical idea over Shots 4–6 in the Context and No-context viewing conditions.

Circus/Tent/Building = mention the circus tent or other building; Land on Circus/Tent = mention of landing on the circus or building.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Frequency of participants that reported the critical thought between the Context and No-context viewing conditions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Percentage of participants who perceived new events in Shots 1–6 in the Context and No-context viewing conditions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Frequency of events perceived for each shot in the Context and No-context conditions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Similarity in gaze distribution as a function of viewing condition + inference group (No-context + No-inference [blue], No-context + Inference [red] and Context + Inference [green], Shuffled Baseline [black] conditions) and Shot (1–6).

Gaze similarity is calculated relative to the Context + Inference group. Similarity is expressed as z-scored probabilities relative to the mean Context + Inference group gaze probability distribution. Values below zero indicate less attentional synchrony than the mean for the Context + Inference group; values above zero indicate higher attentional synchrony than the mean. Error bars indicate +/- 1 standard error across individuals for each frame.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Similarity in gaze distribution as a function of the viewing condition + inference group (the No-context + No-inference [blue], No-context + Inference [red] and Context + Inference [green] conditions) and Shot (1–6).

Similarity is expressed as z-scored probabilities relative to the Context + Inference baseline gaze probability distribution. Larger values indicate greater attentional synchrony, while lower values indicate less attentional synchrony.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Mean foveation probability as a function of the viewing + inference condition (the No-context + No-inference [blue], No-context + Inference [red] and Context + Inference [green], Shuffled Baseline [black] conditions) and Shot (1–6).

Error bars represent the standard error.

More »

Fig 6 Expand