Table 1.
Structural (fiber density) connections with significant group-wise differences.
Fig 1.
(A) Structural (fiber density) connections with significant group-wise differences. (B) Structural (fiber density) connections that showed significant correlations with fMRI. Green dots and lines represent nodes and edges showing the most significant correlation between structural and functional connectivity, respectively.
Table 2.
Structural (fiber density) connections that showed significant correlation with fMRI.
r1 and p1 represent the correlation value and p-value of the first region of the connection listed in the leftmost column, respectively. r2 and p2 represent the correlation value and p-value of the second region of the connection, respectively.
Fig 2.
Correlation between structural and functional connectivity of various regions.
Six connections with significant correlations between structural and functional connections are reported.
Table 3.
Identified regions and features and their contributions to BMI values.
R-squared and p-values are reported. Features with two regions are associated with structural (fiber density) connections, and features with one region are associated with functional correlations. Each structural connection has two regions, and the first region is used as the seed region. Structural and functional features that best explained BMI are shown in italicized bold font.
Fig 3.
Linear regression results between structural and functional features of different regions that best explained BMI.
Fig 4.
Comparison of actual and predicted BMI between HW and non-HW subjects.