Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

The search algorithms used in the literature search according to each database.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the present review.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of the search strategy.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Studies excluded after full text consideration with corresponding main reason of exclusion.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Studies that could not be retrieved for full text analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Protocols of the studies included in the present systematic review.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Treatment effects in the studies included in the present systematic review.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Risk of bias for the randomised clinical trials according to the Cochrane tool.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Risk of bias for the controlled clinical trials according to the modified Downs and Black tool.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Results of the sensitivity analyses for each of the included parameter according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in total mandibular length according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in mandibular ramus height according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in composite mandibular length (Pancherz analysis) according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in mandibular base (Pancherz analysis) according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in SNA angle according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in SNB angle according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in ANB angle according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in maxillary base (Pancherz analysis) according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in facial divergence according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Forest plots for the annualised changes in mandibular incisor proclination according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 10.

The p values of the Egger regression intercept test and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test on the on the publication bias analyses for each of the included parameter according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

The cephalometric measurements that were pooled for the meta-analyses.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

The 95% Prediction intervals for each of the included parameter according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

The GRADE assessment for each of the primary outcomes, according to the pre-pubertal and pubertal subgroups.

More »

Table 13 Expand