Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart representing the study selection process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics of the RP and EBRT groups in all patients (n = 891).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Survival curves depicting overall survival in the radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) groups, in (A) all (P <0.0001), (B) low-risk (P = 0.1366), (C) intermediate-risk (P = 0.0067), and (D) high-risk patients (P = 0.0001), respectively.

Each P-value indicates the result of log-rank test.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Survival curves depicting cancer-specific survival in the radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) groups, in (A) all (P = 0.0010), (B) low-risk (P <0.0001), (C) intermediate-risk (P = 0.1820), and (D) high-risk patients (P = 0.0233), respectively.

Each P-value indicates the result of log-rank test.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Other-cause mortality in the radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) groups (log-rank test, P = 0.0001).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline patient characteristics of the RP and EBRT groups in high-risk patients (n = 336).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological factors for cancer-specific survival.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Survival curves depicting biochemical recurrence-free survival in the radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) groups, in (A) all (P <0.0001), (B) low-risk (P = 0.0230), (C) intermediate-risk (P = 0.0030), and (D) high-risk patients (P = 0.0025), respectively.

Each P-value indicates the result of log-rank test.

More »

Fig 5 Expand