Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants with obesity.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Percentages of obese individuals with a poor HR-QoL domain score, according to obesity grade with and without T2D.

(A) Men. (B) Women. Obesity grade 1: BMI 30–34.9 kg/m2 Obesity grade 2: BMI 35–39.9 kg/m2 Obesity grade 3: BMI ≥40 kg/m2 The corresponding cut-off value derived from the scores in the normal weight population for the individual domains (25th percentile men, 25th percentile women): PF = physical functioning (95.0, 90.0); RP = role limitations due to physical health problems (100.0, 100.0); BP = bodily pain (79.6, 67.4); GH = general health (65.0, 65.0); VT = vitality (60.0, 55.0); SF = social functioning (87.5, 75.0); RE = role limitations due to emotional problems (100.0, 100.0); MH = mental health (76.0, 72.0). Mantel-Haenszel tests was used to check for a linear trend in proportions across groups of obesity grade without T2D and separately for groups of obesity grade with T2D. * indicates a linear trend at P <0.005; a P <0.001; and b P <0.002.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Percentages of obese individuals with a poor HR-QoL domain score, according to MetS.

(A) Men. (B) Women. MetS = metabolic syndrome. The corresponding cut-off value derived from the scores in the normal weight population for the individual domains (25th percentile men, 25th percentile women): PF = physical functioning (95.0, 90.0); RP = role limitations due to physical health problems (100.0, 100.0); BP = bodily pain (79.6, 67.4); GH = general health (65.0, 65.0); VT = vitality (60.0, 55.0); SF = social functioning (87.5, 75.0); RE = role limitations due to emotional problems (100.0, 100.0); MH = mental health (76.0, 72.0). Chi-square tests were used to analyse the differences in proportions between the obese without MetS and the obese with MetS. * indicates a difference relative to the reference group (individuals with obesity in the absence of MetS) at P <0.005; a P <0.001; and b P <0.002.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Percentages of obese individuals with a poor HR-QoL domain score, according to level of hs-CRP.

(A) Men. (B) Women. hs-CRP = high sensitivity C-reactive protein. The corresponding cut-off value derived from the scores in the normal weight population for the individual domains (25th percentile men, 25th percentile women): PF = physical functioning (95.0, 90.0); RP = role limitations due to physical health problems (100.0, 100.0); BP = bodily pain (79.6, 67.4); GH = general health (65.0, 65.0); VT = vitality (60.0, 55.0); SF = social functioning (87.5, 75.0); RE = role limitations due to emotional problems (100.0, 100.0); MH = mental health (76.0, 72.0). Mantel-Haenszel tests was used to check for a linear trend in proportions across groups of hs-CRP level within the obese population. * indicates a linear trend for individuals with obesity and higher levels of hs-CRP at P <0.005; a P <0.001; and b P <0.002.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for having a poor score on each domain of HR-QoL, according to grade of obesity and T2D.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for having a poor score on each domain of HR-QoL according to MetS.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for having a poor score on each domain of HR-QoL according to level of hs-CRP.

More »

Table 4 Expand