Fig 1.
The CONSORT flow diagram for this study.
Table 1.
Participant characteristics.
Table 2.
Comparison within- and between the two training groups from baseline to 8-weeks follow-up.
Fig 2.
Average normalized center of mass (COM) vector length of one participant during backward perturbations at baseline and 8-weeks follow-up.
Fig 3.
Results of the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scale (CGI-I).
Table 3.
Comparison of baseline, 8- and 12-weeks follow-up.
Table 4.
Correlation between the differences from baseline to 8-weeks follow-up of the FAB scale with the differences from baseline to 8-weeks follow-up of other outcomes.