Fig 1.
Flowchart showing the study selection procedure for identified and included articles.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the 32 studies included in this meta-analysis, grouped by TLR gene, SNP and ethnicity.
Fig 2.
Forest plot of the association between TLR1 rs4833095 and TB risk for all five models.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig 3.
Forest plot of the association between TLR2 rs5743708 and TB risk for all five models in the Asian subgroup.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig 4.
Forest plot of the association between TLR2 rs5743708 and TB risk for all five models in the Hispanic subgroup.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig 5.
Forest plot of the association between TLR2 rs3804100 and TB risk for all five models.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig 6.
Forest plot of the association between TLR4 rs4986791 and TB risk for all five models in the Asian subgroup.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig 7.
Forest plot of the association between TLR6 rs5743810 and TB risk for all five models.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig 8.
Forest plot of the association between TLR9 rs352139 and TB risk for all five models.
A) Allelic model, B) Homozygote comparison, C) Heterozygote comparison, D) Dominant model, E) Recessive model. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.