Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A summary of SLapRLS.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Procedure of this work.

Firstly, label dataset are derived from Phospho.ELM, and it is split into train dataset and test dataset. Secondly, the model is developed using train dataset and its similarity matrix with SLapRLS, with which the predicted result of test dataset is achieved. Additionally, an independent test dataset is used. The model that predicts the independent dataset is developed with all the label dataset.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

ROC curves of different algorithms.

ROC curves of kinase Erk2, Erk1, CDC2 and PKC alpha achieved by four different algorithms are plotted. The red line, blue line, yellow line and cyan line represent SLapRLS, SVM, BDT and KNN, respectively.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Compared AUC values of the four algorithms: SLapRLS, SVM, BDT and KNN.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of the four algorithms at high stringency level (sp = 0.99).

The Sn, Sp, Acc and Mcc values at high stringency level (sp = 0.99) of four algorithms on the S/T and Y kinases.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Weblogos of S/T substrate kinases and Y substrate kinases.

A and C are the Weblogos of kinase ATM and ck2 alora2 and B and D are the Weblogos of kinase EGFR and INSR.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison among SLapRLS, iGPS and NetworKIN on independent test data.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Pathway enrichment analysis of PKC alpha.

More »

Table 3 Expand