Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Material properties of specimens.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Cross-section of the column.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Dimension details and section properties of columns.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Cross-section of the beam.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Dimension details and section properties of beams.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Cross-section of the beam end connector.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Details of specimens’ ID.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Schematic diagram of test set-up.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Average M-θ graphs for each set of specimens.

M-θ graphs for specimens with column A, (b) M-θ graphs for specimens with column B. Contrary to an idealized graph of connections, these curves indicate non-linear behavior from the starting point. The major reasons for this overall non-linear behavior is due to the relative slippage between the column and the beam end connector, yielding of the tabs, or some points on the end-connector or the column perforation walls due to localized stress concentration, and geometrical non-linearity. The average results of experimental testing are given in Table 5.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Average test results.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Connection failure.

(a) Front view, (b) Back view.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Deformation of columns.

(a) Column A, (b) Column B.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Deformation of the beam end connector.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Deformation of tabs.

(a) Deformation of tabs in connector ‘A’, (b) Deformation of tabs in connector ‘B’.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 6.

Comparison of the Initial stiffness, Slope to half-ultimate moment and equal area methods.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 10.

Effect of varying beam depth with constant column thickness and number of tabs in the beam end connector.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Effect of varying column thickness with constant beam depth and number of tabs in the beam end connector.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Effect of the geometry of the beam end connector.

More »

Fig 12 Expand