Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart experiment schedule (upper row) versus regular schedule (lower row).

N = Nurse; D = Doctor

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Background characteristics of all children aged 0–9 months in experiment and control region, before (2010) and during (2011) the experiment.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Competence of nurses to perform 5 medical screenings, experiment and control regions compared.

T1 = at the start of the training, T2 = after one year experience with the new working method. Exp = experiment region, contr = control region. The 95% confidence intervals are indicated by black error bars.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Competence development of general roles nurse, experiment and control regions compared.

T1 = at the start of the training, T2 = after one year experience with the new working method. Exp = experiment region, contr = control region. The 95% confidence intervals are indicated by black error bars.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Flow chart assignment procedure, showing number of children assigned to experimental (left) vs regular (right) care schedule.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Percentage of children assigned to experiment schedule in both experiment teams.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Percentage of children with abnormal findings.

A comparison is shown between abnormal findings of heart, eyes, hips and growth, in experiment and control region, before and during the experiment. The 95% confidence intervals are indicated by black error bars.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Percentage of children referred with abnormal findings.

A comparison is shown between abnormal findings of heart, eyes, hips and growth, in experiment and control region, before and during the experiment. The black error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Fig 7 Expand