Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Step 1 of sample vignette.

This figure corresponds to screenshot of the website: first step of vignette with closed-ended question.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Step 2 of sample vignette.

This figure corresponds to screenshot of the website: second step of the same vignette with the same closed-ended question.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Step 3 of sample vignette.

This figure corresponds to screenshot of the website: third and last step of the same vignette with the same closed-ended question.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Example of final agreement and sequential agreement.

In this example final agreement was high because the final treatment proposed at the last step of the vignette response was identical to the final treatment administered at the end of the vignette source situation in the documentation: hysterectomy. However sequential agreement was low because the management sequence was dissimilar between that proposed in the vignette response and that in the vignette source situation from the documentation: selective arterial embolization was added as a potential vignette response.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Study design.

This figure describes study design and flow chart of the study.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Final agreement in cases previously managed by the obstetrician.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Final agreement in cases managed by other obstetrician.

More »

Table 2 Expand