Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CONSORT flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Overview of the study procedures.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Patient characteristics of study participants by intervention and control group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Association between quality of sputum sample and patient characteristics, according to intervention (exposure to sputum submission instruction video, n = 100) or control group (standard care, n = 100).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sputum smear positive microscopy results in the intervention (exposure to the sputum submission instruction video) and control group (standard of care), overall and stratified by sex.

Numbers on the bars indicate absolute number of patients.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Quantitative grading scale of sputum smear microscopy results in the intervention (exposure to the sputum submission instruction video) and control group (standard of care).

Numbers on the bars indicate absolute number of patients. Overall P value across groups was <0.0001.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Sputum volume in the intervention (exposure to the sputum submission instruction video) and control group (standard of care).

Numbers on the bars indicate absolute number of patients. Overall P value across groups was <0.0001.

More »

Fig 5 Expand