Fig 1.
A sketch of the physical problem.
Table 1.
Comparison table of the values of f′′(0) and h′(0) when M = 0 with recent literature.
Table 2.
Wall temperature gradient ∣−θ′(0)∣ for the PST case taking Pr = 0.72, R = 1 β = −0.25, L = 1, Ec = 1 and Nr = 2.0.
Table 3.
Wall temperature gradient ∣g(0)∣ for the PHF case taking Pr = 0.72, R = 1 β = −0.25, L = 1, Ec = 1 and Nr = 2.0.
Fig 2.
Initial values F′′(0) and h′(0) versus α and M.
Fig 3.
Effect of α on velocity profiles f′(η) for M = 0.1, δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 4.
Effect of α on velocity profiles h(η) for M = 0.1, δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 5.
Effect of α on temperature profile for M = 0.1, δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 6.
Effect of magnetic parameter M on velocity profiles f′(η) for δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 7.
Effect of magnetic parameter M on velocity profiles h(η) for δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 8.
Effects of magnetic parameter M on temperature profiles (PST case) for δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0 and L = 1.0.
Fig 9.
Effects of magnetic parameter M on temperature profiles (PHF case) for δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0 and L = 1.0.
Fig 10.
Effects of ϵ on temperature profiles (PST case) for δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0 and L = 1.0.
Fig 11.
Effects of ϵ on temperature profiles (PHF case) for δ = 0.2, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0 and L = 1.0.
Fig 12.
Effect of β on velocity profiles f′(η) for M = 0.1, δ = 0.2, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 13.
Effect of β on velocity profiles h(η) for M = 0.1, δ = 0.2, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 14.
Effect of δ on velocity profiles f′(η) for M = 0.1, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 15.
Effect of δ on velocity profiles h(η) for M = 0.1, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 16.
Effect of δ on temperature profile (PST case) for M = 0.1, β = −0.25, α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 17.
Effects of thermal radiation parameter Nr on temperature profiles θ(η) for δ = 0.2, Pr = 0.72, β = −0.25, Ec = 1.0, α = −0.95, M = 0.1, R = 1.0 and L = 1.0.
Fig 18.
Effects of thermal radiation parameter Nr on temperature profiles g(η) for δ = 0.2, Pr = 0.72, β = −0.25, Ec = 1.0, α = −0.95, M = 0.1, R = 1.0 and L = 1.0.
Fig 19.
Effect of M on Skin friction coefficients for α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 20.
Effect of δ on Skin friction coefficients for α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 21.
Effect of M on heat transfer coefficients for α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.
Fig 22.
Effect of δ on heat transfer coefficients for α = −0.95, Pr = 0.72, Nr = 0.2, Ec = 1.0, R = 1.0, L = 1.0 and ϵ = 0.5.