Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The flow chart of this study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of 86 mechanically ventilated difficult-to-wean patients included in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Weaning parameters measured before and after tracheostomy.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of weaning parameters measured before and after tracheostomy in patients with weaning success and weaning failure.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of the changes in weaning parameters in patients with different weaning outcome and patients with different tracheostomy tube size.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of weaning parameters between weaning success and weaning failure group.

Before tracheostomy, the weaning parameters were no difference between the two groups. After tracheostomy, the MIP, MEP, Vt, Ve and RSBI showed significant improvement in the weaning success group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of weaning parameters between weaning success and weaning failure group.

Before tracheostomy, the weaning parameters were no difference between the two groups. After tracheostomy, the MIP, MEP, Vt, Ve and RSBI showed significant improvement in the weaning success group.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of factors for predicting weaning success in 86 difficult-to-wean patients who received tracheostomy.

More »

Table 5 Expand