Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data of HCC and non-malignant chronic liver disease patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Differential expression of serum miRNA levels in HCC and healthy controls.

Relative expression of miRNAs miR-19a (P = 0.0002), miR-296 (P<0.0001), miR-130a (P<0.0001), miR-195 (P = 0.04), miR-192 (P<0.0001), miR-34a (P<0.0001), and miR-146a (P<0.0001) in serum of HCC (n = 112) compared to healthy controls (n = 42). Data are presented as median with interquartile range. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test.* means statistical significance (P<0.05).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Differential expression of serum miRNA levels in HCC and CLD patients.

The box represents the 25%-75% percentiles; the line inside the box represents the median and the upper and lower lines representing the 10%-90% percentiles of fold change in expression levels of studied miRNAs in serum of CLD (n = 125) and HCC patients (n = 112). Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Signature of serum miRNAs relative expression during HCV-related liver disease progression.

Panel (A) represents fold change of miRNA expression levels in early fibrosis (F1-F2, n = 75), late fibrosis (F3-F4, n = 50), and HCC (n = 112) groups. Comparison between F1-F2 vs F3-F4 or F3-F4 vs HCC was analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test. Panel (B) represents detailed analysis of miRNA relative expression levels at different fibrosis stages (F1, n = 45, F2, n = 30, F3, n = 18, F4, n = 32) and HCC (n = 112). Comparison was done by Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare F1-F3 vs F4 or F4 vs HCC. The box represents the 25%-75% percentiles; the line inside the box represents the median and the upper and lower lines representing the 10%-90% percentiles.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers to differentiate HCC patients from healthy controls.

ROC curve analysis of serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers differentiating HCC patients (n = 112) from healthy controls (n = 42).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers to differentiate HCC from non-malignant CLD.

ROC curve analysis of serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers differentiating HCC patients (n = 112) from CLD (n = 125).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers to differentiate HCC patients from late fibrosis (F3-F4) subgroup.

ROC curve analysis of serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers differentiating HCC (n = 112) from F3-F4 patients (n = 50).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Diagnostic performances of serum miRNAs to discriminate HCC patients from healthy controls, non-malignant CLD patients, and late fibrosis (F3-F4) subgroup.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis of miRNAs.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

Diagnostic performance of the miRNA panel.

AUCs of the miRNA panel (A) and miRNA panel in differentiating HCC from healthy controls (B), CLD (C), and F3-F4 patients (D).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of AUC of the miRNA panel with that of AFP.

AUCs of the miRNA panel and AFP in differentiating HCC from healthy controls (A), CLD (B), and F3-F4 patients (C).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Correlations between serum miRNAs levels in HCC group.

A correlation map with a blue-red (cold-hot) scale. The blue color corresponds to a correlation close to -1 and the red color corresponds to a correlation close to 1. Green corresponds to a correlation close to 0. Correlations are made by spearman correlation.

More »

Fig 9 Expand