Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Treatment with DHA and DHA/HTF decreased Jurkat cell viability.

Jurkat cells (1 × 104/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) for 24, 48 or 72 h(a) or DHA/HTF for 48 h(b). The cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 assay. The results represented mean ± standard deviation. ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

HTF enhanced ROS production following DHA exposure.

Jurkat cells (1 × 106/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) or DHA/HTF for 48 h. The fluorescent probe DCFH-DA identified a dose-dependent increase in ROS following exposure to DHA. Furthermore, combined exposure of Jurkat cells to 20 μM DHA and 20 μM HTF produced over three-fold more ROS than exposure to 20 μM DHA alone (p < 0.001). The results represented mean ± standard deviation. ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

DHA and DHA/HTF promote Jurkat cell apoptosis.

Jurkat cells (1 × 106/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) or DHA/HTF for 48 h, and measured apoptosis by Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry. DHA induced a dose-dependent increase in apoptosis (a). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). DHA/HTF induced a 2.75-fold increase in apoptosis relative to control (p < 0.001). The results represented mean ± standard deviation (b). ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

DHA and DHA/HTF impaired cell cycle progression in Jurkat cells.

Jurkat cells (1 × 106/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) or DHA/HTF for 48 h, Cell cycle analysis of DHA- and DHA/HTF-treated cells was performed using flow cytometry. The ratio of cells in S and G2/M phases decreased while the numbers in G0/G1 phase increased in a dose-dependent manner (a, b). The results represented mean ± standard deviation. ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Treatment of Jurkat cells with DHA or DHA/HTF inhibited TfR mRNA expression.

Jurkat cells (1 × 106/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) or DHA/HTF for 48 h, Treatment of Jurkat cells with DHA induced a dose-dependent decrease in TfR expression (a). Compared with DHA treatment, DHA/HTF treatment decreased TfR expression by 43.21% (p < 0.001). Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that PCR products were of the expected size (b). GAPDH: 258 bp; TfR: 83 bp. The results represented mean ± standard deviation. ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Treatment of Jurkat cells with DHA or DHA/HTF inhibited VEGF mRNA expression.

Jurkat cells (1 × 106/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) or DHA/HTF for 48 h, treatment of Jurkat cells with DHA induced a dose-dependent decrease in VEGF expression (a). Compared with DHA treatment, DHA/HTF treatment decreased VEGF expression by 47.77% (p < 0.001). Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that PCR products were of the expected size (b). GAPDH: 258 bp; VEGF: 91 bp. The results represented mean ± standard deviation. ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Treatment of Jurkat cells with DHA or DHA/HTF inhibited telomerase activity.

Jurkat cells (1 × 106/well) were exposed to DHA (0, 10, 20, 40, 80 μM) or DHA/HTF for 48 h, treatment of Jurkat cells with DHA induced a dose-dependent decrease hTERT expression (a). Compared with DHA treatment, DHA/HTF treatment decreased hTERT expression by 31.13% (p < 0.001). Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that PCR products were of the expected size (b). GAPDH: 258 bp; hTERT: 134 bp. The results represented mean ± standard deviation. ***p<0.001, compared with the control group, # p<0.001, compared with DHA.

More »

Fig 7 Expand