Table 1.
Comparison of the two groups of anxious versus non-anxious patients.
Results are presented as means and standard deviations or frequencies, except for serum CT-proET-1 concentrations which are given as medians and interquartile ranges.
Table 2.
Results from logistic regression models with clinically relevant anxiety as dependent variable adjusted for the confounders indicated.
In models 2 and 3, CT-proET-1 was included as an independent variable and in model 3, HADS-D was additionally entered as a covariate.
Table 3.
Moderator analyses of the relationship between anxiety and CT-proET-1 Each model was adjusted for sex, age, systolic blood pressure, left atrial diameter, LVEDD, Framingham sum, and HADS depression using anxiety as outcome measure.