Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Sites with human remains analyzed in the SIGN-Project [31].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Plan of Kfar HaHoresh (modified after [22]).

Loci with human remains analyzed in this study: blue numbers indicate related individuals in Group A/B, blue line indicates individuals related according to the distance analysis. *Loc. 1155 includes Loci 1352, 1353 and 1373. Blue colored = middle occupational period red colored = late occupational period filled / unfilled square = male / male? Adult; filled / unfilled circle female/female? Adult; unfilled diamond = adult indet; filled / unfilled triangle pointing upwards = male/male? juvenile, filled / unfilled triangle pointing downwards = female/female? Junvenile; cross = infans.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Archaeological and relevant anthropological data of the analyzed individuals from Kfar HaHoresh.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Sex distributions of the investigated individuals.

n = absolute numbers (based on data from Eshed et al. [46]; modified after Simmons S1 Table).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

List of traits evaluated for the analyses of biological relationship on teeth from Kfar HaHoresh.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Four traits with increased frequency in Kfar HaHoresh and their relative frequencies within the population of Kfar HaHoresh and within the reference population.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of the search for pairwise similarities.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Distribution of common traits in Group A.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Frequencies of group defining traits for Group A.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Distribution of common traits in Group B.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Frequencies of group defining traits for Group B.

More »

Table 8 Expand