Table 1.
Participant information for the norming studies and experiments.
Fig 1.
Ratings of the five policy responses along a dimension of reform- to enforcement-oriented.
Fig 2.
The proportion of policy responses that were matched to the beast and virus metaphors.
Error bars reflect 95% confidence intervals.
Table 2.
The frequency (and proportion) of each policy chosen in Steen et al.’s Experiment 4 [7] and the current Experiment 1.
Fig 3.
The distribution of policy choices by metaphor frame for three samples.
a. Steen et al.’s Experiment 4 of [7] (from the virus and beast original report conditions); b. the current Experiment 1; and c. data pooled from Experiments 3 and 4 of [6]. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals.
Table 3.
Frequencies (and proportions) of selections of each policy by frame.
Table 4.
The best fitting logistic regression model for data pooled from Steen et al.’s Experiment 4 [7] and the current Experiment 1 based on an old coding scheme.
Table 5.
The best fitting model of re-coded data from Steen et al.’s Experiment 4 [7] and the current Experiment 1 based on a current coding scheme.
Table 6.
Mean ratings of three “Crime is a …” frames (sd).