Table 1.
Compositions and their percentage (%) of nanoemulsions (Nano-1-Amp and Nano-2-Amp).
Table 2.
Isolation time (days) of cuticles of four citrus cultivars using leaf disks of different sizes and different concentrations of pectinase and cellulase.
Table 3.
Comparison of several parameters between asymptomatic and symptomatic cuticles.
Table 4.
Cuticular permeability of candidate adjuvants.
Table 5.
Physiochemical characterizations of nanoemulsions.
Fig 1.
Inhibitory zone diameter of nano-formulations of Nano-1-Amp+Brij 35 and Nano-2-Amp+Brij 35.
All data were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range tests using SAS software package. Different letters represented significantly differences at the level of 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05).
Fig 2.
Ct value detected by qPCR in HLB-affected citrus after foliar spraying by nano-formulations.
Fig 3.
HLB-affected citrus treated by nano-formulations.
(A): Amp (left) vs. tap water (CK) (right); (B): Nano-1-Amp+Brij 35 (left) vs. tap water (CK) (right); (C): Nano-2-Amp+Brij 35 (left) vs. tap water (CK) (right).