Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

LD50 Values and Concentrations of Compounds.

LD50 values of pyrethroids [5, 2123] and their maximum detected concentrations in wax, pollen and bees as well as the total detected concentration [5]. The mean LD50 value was calculated and displayed when several LD50 values had been reported in the literature.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Chemical structures of compounds used in this study.

(A) grayanotoxin I [38]; (B) aconitine [39]; (C) pyrethrin [40]; (D) allethrin [41]; (E) cyfluthrin [21]; (F) permethrin [22]; (G) tau-fluvalinate [23].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Compounds used in this Study, the LD50 Values for Bees and Their Interactions with Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Behaviours.

Descriptions of behaviours recorded using Noldus Observer 5.0, over the ten min observation period.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Acute effects of pyrethroids and nectar toxins, at a dose of 10 ng/bee (37 ng/bee for GTX I), on honeybee motor function and wing fanning behaviour.

This figure illustrates how compounds affect the percentage of time, number of bouts and mean duration of: (A-C) walking; (D-F) still; (G-I) upside down; (J-L) wing fanning. Sample size N = 16/treatment. * indicates P<0.05. [C = control, Ac = aconitine, Al = allethrin, GTX = grayanotoxin I, Cyf = cyfluthrin, Flu = tau-fluvalinate, Per = permethrin].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Acute effects of pyrethroids and nectar toxins, at a dose of 10 ng/bee (37 ng/bee for grayanotoxin I), on honeybee grooming behaviour.

This figure illustrates how compounds affected the percentage of time that bees spent: (A) grooming (pooled total of all grooming behaviours); (B) abdomen grooming; (C) leg grooming; (D) facial grooming (E) proboscis grooming; (F) antennal grooming. Sample size N = 16/treatment. * indicates P<0.05. [C = control, Ac = aconitine, Al = allethrin, GTX = grayanotoxin I, Cyf = cyfluthrin, Flu = tau-fluvalinate, Per = permethrin].

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Pyrethroid/Nectar Toxin Study Summary Statistics.

P values and Chi-squared values (with degrees of freedom indicated) for statistical analysis of motor, wing fanning and total grooming behaviour.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Pyrethroid/Nectar Toxin Study Summary Statistics.

P value and Chi-square values (with degrees of freedom indicated) for statistical analysis of grooming behaviour.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Acute effects of two concentrations of GTX (10 μM and 100 μM) on honeybee motor function and wing fanning.

This figure illustrates how the different concentrations of GTX affect the percentage of time, number of bouts and mean duration of: (A-C) walking; (D-F) still; (G-I) upside down; (J-L) wing fanning. Sample size N = 16/treatment. * indicates P<0.05. [C = control, Ac = aconitine, Al = allethrin, GTX = grayanotoxin I, Cyf = cyfluthrin, Flu = tau-fluvalinate, Per = permethrin].

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 6.

GTX Dose-Dependent Summary Statistics.

More »

Table 6 Expand