Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Reference soils used in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Degradation of plant-derived GLS hydrolysis products in ML soil.

The lines represent the fit of the data to a first-order degradation curve. The bars show the standard deviation for three replicates.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Kinetic parameters of pure allyl-ITC degradation in three reference soils (AL, KL, ML) obtained by fitting of the eqs 1 and 2.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Breakdown of allyl-GLS in three different soils (AL, KL, and ML).

A) Degradation of pure allyl-GLS (0.32 μmol/g soil) in soil (treatment I). B) Degradation of pure allyl-GLS (0.32 μmol/g soil) in autoclaved soil (treatment I). C) Degradation of pure allyl-GLS (0.16 μmol/g soil) in soil with addition of 0.1 U/g myrosinase (treatment II). GLS: glucosinolate; allyl-CN: 3-butenylnitrile; ITC: isothiocyanate. Given are means and standard deviations of three (2B) or four replicates (2A, 2C).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cluster analysis of bacterial communities from soils as the effect of allyl-GLS and allyl-GLS + myrosinase (MYR) seven days after treatment.

Displayed are all four replicates (1–4), Gel-Compar II 6.5. Soil treated in a similar way but without the addition of GLS-treatment was used as a control. The first letter (A, M, or K) indicates the soil, the second letter(s) indicate(s) the treatment (S: sinigrin = allyl-GLS; SM: sinigrin + MYR; U: untreated = control), and the numbers 1–4 indicate the repetitions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons between bacterial similarity measures obtained within soil replicates.

More »

Table 3 Expand