Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram of the study selection process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient characteristics of participants in studies included in the meta-analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Quality assessment of included studies in the meta-analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plot showing the effects of nutritional risk group compared to nutritional normal group on overall complications.

SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Funnel plots for the overall complications in nutritional risk group compared to nutritional normal group.

SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plot showing the effects of nutritional risk group compared to nutritional normal group on infective complications.

SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forest plot showing the effects of nutritional risk group compared to nutritional normal group on mortality.

SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Forest plot showing the effects of nutritional risk group compared to nutritional normal group on length of hospital stay.

SE, standard error; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 6 Expand