Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Results of a nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening program performed in Cangwu, a high-risk area in China.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Nasopharyngeal EBV DNA load and serum VCA/IgA titers in seropositive high-risk population.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Relationship of EBV DNA load and DNA amount in the nasopharyngeal swabs.

The swab EBV DNA load showed only a modest correlation with the DNA amount in the nasopharyngeal swabs (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.30, P < 0.001).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Multivariate liner regression for the relation between age, sex, β-globin copy numbers, serum VCA/IgA and nasopharyngeal EBV DNA load.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

EBV load and VCA/IgA titers in males and females.

Nasopharyngeal EBV load and serum VCA/IgA titers by gender and age groups. (a) Mean EBV load in females was higher than that of males by different age groups; EBV load increased with age in both genders. (b) There was no difference in VCA/IgA titers between males and females in different age groups; VCA/IgA titers increased with age in both males and females.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Nasopharyngeal EBV DNA load and serum VCA/IgA titers by gender and age.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Diagnostic performance of EBV load and VCA/IgA titers.

Cut-off values (COV) and areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EBV load and VCA/IgA titers. (a) The optimal COV for EBV load was mean plus 2 standard deviations (i.e. 4.7×105 copies/swab); (b) The best COV for VCA/IgA titers was mean plus standard deviation (i.e. 1:20); (c) The ROC curve indicated that EBV load had a better diagnostic value than VCA/IgA titers; the area under the curve of EBV load was larger than VCA/IgA titers.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of viral load and VCA/IgA titers between NPC and NPC-free high-risk subjects.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Cut-off values for EBV load and VCA/IgA titers.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Area under the operating characteristics curve.

More »

Table 7 Expand