Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Examples of popular methods to ‘integrate’ care [3] within the health system [5].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Outcome measures.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

PRISMA flow diagram of study selection [56].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Demographics of included studies.

N/R = Not Reported; N/A = Not Applicable.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Context of included studies.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Details of interventions.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Quality of included studies.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Forrest plot for self-assessed health status outcome.

Effect estimates are the standardised mean difference, where the solid vertical line at 0 indicates no effect. Effect estimates are based on a random-effects model. Each subtotal shows the overall effect estimate for the time-period indicated.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forrest plot for mortality outcome.

Effect estimates are the standardised mean difference, where the solid vertical line at 0 indicates no effect. Effect estimates are based on a random-effects model. Each subtotal shows the overall effect estimate for the time-period indicated.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forrest plot for total cost of services outcome.

Effect estimates are the standardised mean difference, where the solid vertical line at 0 indicates no effect. Effect estimates are based on a random-effects model. Each subtotal shows the overall effect estimate for the time-period indicated.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Forrest plot for utilisation of primary and non-specialist care outcome.

Effect estimates are the standardised mean difference, where the solid vertical line at 0 indicates no effect. Effect estimates are based on a random-effects model. Each subtotal shows the overall effect estimate for the time-period indicated.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Forrest plot for utilisation of secondary care outcome.

Effect estimates are the standardised mean difference, where the solid vertical line at 0 indicates no effect. Effect estimates are based on a random-effects model. Each subtotal shows the overall effect estimate for the time-period indicated.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Forrest plot for patient satisfaction outcome.

Effect estimates are the standardised mean difference, where the solid vertical line at 0 indicates no effect. Effect estimates are based on a random-effects model. Each subtotal shows the overall effect estimate for the time-period indicated.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 7.

Results of subgroup analyses.

No significant differences between subgroups (p<0.05). Note: Positive effect size favours case management for all measures.

More »

Table 7 Expand